Selinker suggests that the most important distinguishing factor related to L2 acquisition is the phenomenon links bracelet of fossilization. However, both his explanation that “fossilizable linguistic phenomena are linguistic items, rules, and subsystems which speakers of a particular native language will tend to keep in their interlingua relative to a particular target language, no links of london sweetie bracelets matter what the age of the learner or amount of explanation or instruction he receives in the target language” (Selinker, 1972, p. 215) and his hypotheses on IL fossilization are fascinating in that they contradict our basic links of london sweetie understanding of the human capacity to learn. How is it that some learners can overcome IL fossilization, even if they only constitute, according to Selinker, “a mere 5%” (1972, p. 212), while the majority of L2 learners cannot, ‘no matter sweetie bracelet what the age or amount of explanation or instruction’? Or is it perhaps not that they cannot overcome fossilization, but that they will not? Does complacency set in after L2 learners begin to communicate, as far as they are concerned, effectively friendship bracelets nough, in the TL, and as a result does motivation to achieve native-like competence diminish?
Πρόσφατα σχόλια
πριν από 3 ώρες 11 δευτερόλεπτα
πριν από 3 ώρες 12 δευτερόλεπτα
πριν από 3 ώρες 13 δευτερόλεπτα
πριν από 3 ώρες 22 δευτερόλεπτα
πριν από 3 ώρες 24 δευτερόλεπτα
πριν από 20 ώρες 41 λεπτά
πριν από 20 ώρες 42 λεπτά
πριν από 20 ώρες 42 λεπτά
πριν από 20 ώρες 42 λεπτά
πριν από 20 ώρες 42 λεπτά